MD, PhD, MAE, FMedSci, FRCP, FRCPEd.

We have often discussed the fact that chiropractic does not offer an effective option of healthcare. This begs the question, if it’s not healthcare, what is it? DD Palmer, the inventor of chiropractic, was tempted by the idea of turning it into a religion. In a way, this makes sense. As we all know, religions are not based on evidence, they are based on powerful beliefs – and so is chiropractic! Thus the concept of chiropractic as a religion might be less far-fetched as it seems at first glance.

Here is an excerpt of a letter by DD Palmer of May 1911, the period where he was very much into the religious idea:

…I occupy in chiropractic a similar position as did Mrs. Eddy in Christian Science. Mrs. Eddy claimed to receive her ideas from the other world and so do I. She founded theron a religion, so may I. I am THE ONLY ONE IN CHIROPRACTIC WHO CAN DO SO…

You ask, what I think will be the final outcome of our law getting. It will be that we will have to build a boat similar to Christian Science and hoist a religious flag. I have received chiropractic from the other world, similar as did Mrs. Eddy. No other one has laid claim to that, NOT EVEN B.J.

Exemption clauses instead of chiro laws by all means, and LET THAT EXEMPTION BE THE RIGHT TO PRACTICE OUR RELIGION. But we must have a religious head, one who is the founder, as did Christ, Mohamed, Jo. Smith, Mrs. Eddy, Martin Luther and other who have founded religions. I am the fountain head. I am the founder of chiropractic in its science, in its art, in its philosophy and in its religious phase. Now, if chiropractors desire to claim me as their head, their leader, the way is clear. My writings have been gradually steering in that direction until now it is time to assume that we have the same right to as has Christian Scientists.

Oregon is free to Chiropractors. California gives Chiropractors only one chance, that of practicing our religion.

The protective policy of the U.C.A. is O.K., but that of religion is far better. The latter can only be assumed by having a leader, a head, a person who has received chiropractic as a science, as an art, as a philosophy and as a religion. Do you catch on?

The policy of the U.C.A. is the best that B.J. can be at the head of, BUT THE RELIGIOUS MOVE IS FAR BETTER, but we must incorporate under the man who received the principles of chiropractic from the other world, who wrote the book of all chiropractic books, who today has much new matter, valuable, which is not contained in that book.

If you will watch my book closely as you read, you will find it has a religion contained in it, altho I do not so name it.
If either of the Davenport schools would take advantage of practicing our religion founded by D.D. Palmer, it will make the way of chiropractic as easy as it was for the S.C.’s…

I feel that, of the many daft and dangerous ideas of Palmer, this one is more plausible and viable than the rest (had he not died several months later, he might have succeeded with his plan). The concept of chiropractic as a religion explains the chiropractors’ stubborn rejection of science, evidence, rationality, etc. as well as their often fanatic belief in their actions. And, of course, it makes the many weird comments of chiropractors on my blog appear in an entirely different light.

 

14 Responses to Is chiropractic a religion?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Subscribe via email

Enter your email address to receive notifications of new blog posts by email.

Recent Comments

Note that comments can be edited for up to five minutes after they are first submitted but you must tick the box: “Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.”

The most recent comments from all posts can be seen here.

Archives
Categories