MD, PhD, MAE, FMedSci, FRCP, FRCPEd.

RUDOLF STEINER died 100 years ago today – a good reason, I think, to remember the utter nonsense he postulated (not only) in the realm of healthcare. Here is a slightly abbreviated section from my recent book:

Rudolf Steiner was born on 25 February 1861 in Kraljević, Austrian-Hungarian empire. At the age of 9, Steiner allegedly had his first spiritual experience; he saw the spirit of his deceased aunt. Realizing Rudolf’s potentials, his father sent his son first to a ‘Realschule’ in Wiener Neustadt and then to the ‘Technische Hochschule’ (Technical University) in Vienna where he studied mathematics, physics, chemistry, botany, biology, literature, and philosophy. While Steiner was still a student, he was appointed as the natural science editor of a new edition of Goethe’s works.

In 1890, Steiner moved to Weimar, Germany, where he was employed at the Schiller-Goethe Archives. Concurrently, he started working for his doctoral degree, which he received in 1891 from the University of Rostock; the title of his dissertation, later published as a book, was ‘Wahrheit und Wissenschaft’ (Truth and Science).
In 1897, Steiner moved to Berlin, where he joined esoteric circles and studied Eastern and occult religions. In 1899, he married Anna Eunicke. Subsequently, Steiner met Marie von Sivers, an actress from the Baltic region and also a devotee of anthroposophy. They got married in 1914.

Steiner had by then joined the Theosophical Society and, in 1902, was made its General Secretary. Years of disagreement with key members of the organisation prompted him to leave the society in 1912. On 28 December of that year, Rudolf Steiner, along with a group of prominent German theosophists, founded the Anthroposophic Society.

Anthroposophy, a term borrowed from the 19th-century Swiss philosopher and physician Ignaz Troxler, is based on the notion that there is a spiritual world that is accessible only to the highest faculties of mental knowledge. Steiner rejected experimentation as a means of gaining knowledge; instead, he relied on imagination, inspiration and intuition. He claimed that his anthroposophy centered on “knowledge produced by the higher self in man.” He believed that humans once participated more fully in spiritual processes of the world through a dreamlike consciousness, but had since become restricted by their attachment to material things.

In 1913 at Dornach, near Basel, Switzerland, Steiner built the first ‘Goetheanum’, which he called a “school of spiritual science.” The building was destroyed by a fire in 1922 and subsequently replaced by the new ‘Goetheanum’ that still exists today. Steiner also worked on various other projects, including education (Waldorf schools) and biodynamic agriculture.

In the late 1910s, Steiner and his mistress, Ita Wegman, started working with medical doctors to create his anthroposophic medicine. In 1920, they founded the ‘Klinisch-Therapeutische Institut’ in Arlesheim, and on 21 March 1921, they organised the first of a series of courses for doctors in Dornach. This day is now considered to be the birth of anthroposophic medicine. In the same year, pharmacists and physicians gathered under Steiner’s guidance to create the pharmaceutical company, ‘Weleda’. At around the same time, Wegman founded the first anthroposophic medical clinic, the ‘Ita Wegman Clinic’ in Arlesheim.

Anthroposophic medicine cannot be adequately described through a single therapeutic modality. It has been aptly called a ‘pluriversum of theories and practices under the umbrella of an anthroposophic worldview’. The anthroposophic concept comprises a range of medications many (but not all) of which are plant-based, as well as art therapy, eurhythy (dance therapy), special dietary approaches, physiotherapy and other modalities. According to Steiner, humans have four ‘bodies’: The physical body, the ‘etheric’ body – which is based on formative forces, the ‘astral’ body – which reflects a person’s emotions and inner drives, and a conscious body – which is the domain of the ego and self.

For non-anthroposophist, these concepts are hardly comprehensible. They are based on associations between planets, metals and organs, from which therapeutic rules are derived. These affinities also form the basis of the many anthroposophical medicines, which are produced by liquefaction, aeration, solidification, combustion, potentiation and other processes. The history of the constituents of anthroposophic remedies is often considered to be more important than their material composition. According to Steiner and his substantial writings, “the spirit of the plant, which is drawn out of the tree by the parasitic plant act on the astral”. During the years before his death, Steiner, who had no medical background, often saw patients himself. He would then stare at them and divine both the diagnosis and the treatment; in other words, he acted as a clairvoyant lay-healer.

The Nazi movement had an ambivalent attitude to Steiner and to anthroposophic medicine. On the one hand, several leading Nazis such as Hess were clearly in favour of anthroposophic medicine. Steiner’s wife, Marie Steiner-von Sivers (1867 – 1948) who made significant contributions to anthroposophic medicine had publicly expressed sympathy for the Nazi regime since its beginnings. On the other hand, a political theorist of the Nazi movement, Dietrich Eckart, criticised Steiner in 1919 and (wrongly) suggested that he was a Jew. In 1921, Adolf Hitler accused Steiner of being a tool of the Jews, while other Nazis even called for a “war against Steiner”. In 1922, Steiner gave a lecture in Munich which was disrupted by Nazi thugs. Such hostilities led Steiner to leave his home in Berlin and move to Dornbach; he stated that, if the Nazis came to power in Germany, it would no longer be possible for him to live in Germany.

From 1923 on, Steiner showed signs of increasing frailness. He nonetheless continued to lecture widely. His last lecture was given in late September 1924. Steiner died at Dornach on 30 March 1925 in the presence of Ita Wegman.

3 Responses to RUDOLF STEINER died 100 years ago

  • Unfortunately, various German media are publishing relatively favourable comments on Steiner, or more precisely on the Waldorf schools he initiated.

    FAZ:

    Of the many life reform movements around 1900, Steiner’s anthroposophy is one of the most vital. The ‘wisdom of man’ sought to combine scientific knowledge with philosophical and spiritual approaches. It gave rise to homeopathy, influenced Rolf Gutbrod’s organic architecture, Christian Schad’s neo-objective painting and, last but not least, Joseph Beuys and paved the way for organic farming. Weleda cosmetics have even made it as far as Hollywood.
    […]
    In Germany and around the world, democracies are also threatened by a neoliberal division of education systems and the resulting hatred of working people towards ‘academic elites’. After just over a hundred years, Waldorf education offers answers to some of the most pressing questions of our time. In addition to a holistic view of our environment, these include educational and gender equality as well as inclusion based on an education that values the abilities of each individual.

    https://archive.is/XBcY8#selection-2231.0-2231.11

    SWR:

    Rudolf Steiner died 100 years ago on Sunday (30 March 1925). A man who continues to polarise opinion to this day: Some revere him, others vehemently reject him. One thing is certain: Not only did Rudolf Steiner establish the first Waldorf school in Stuttgart, but Stuttgart still has an extremely high density of anthroposophy today. It is therefore not surprising that Steiner is being intensively commemorated in Stuttgart this year, especially this weekend.

    https://www.swr.de/swraktuell/baden-wuerttemberg/stuttgart/waldorfschulen-rudolf-steiner-anthroposophie-todestag-feier-demeter-weleda-waldorfpaedagogik-100.html

    In contrast, the left-wing ‘Neues Deutschland’ published a very critical article about Steiner.

    Rudolf Steiner, the founder of anthroposophy, died 100 years ago. His work combines esoteric mysticism with racism and anti-Semitism

    https://www.nd-aktuell.de/artikel/1190144.kritik-der-anthroposophie-rudolf-steiner-der-proto-schwurbler.html

    • I am dedicated to science based medicine and deplore all forms of SCAM, but I do think children flourish in Waldorf schools, especially the earliest years. I don’t say this because I subscribe to any of anthroposophy, but simply because of the dedication to materials and expression and the way children seem to flourish. The Waldorf schools my children and some of my grandchildren attended for the first few years of their educations never pushed any of Steiner’s philosophies beyond the educational bits. There was some anti-vax sentiment, but no more than in the public schools where we lived–admittedly a rather hippy-dippy area. Most of the parents just loved the environment and the beautiful buildings that well off benefactors were able to build and endow. Mine and all the other kids were able to easily transition to public schools at various stages of their education.

  • Just to be correct, he was born in Donji Kraljevec (Lower Kingsvillage in free translation), then Austro-Hungarian Empire, today Croatia. Just born and moved out.
    But we made tourism of it : )

    https://centar-rudolf-steiner.com/?lang=en

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Subscribe via email

Enter your email address to receive notifications of new blog posts by email.

Recent Comments

Note that comments can be edited for up to five minutes after they are first submitted but you must tick the box: “Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.”

The most recent comments from all posts can be seen here.

Archives
Categories