In the previous 3 parts of this series (see here, here and here), we have discussed 9 fake diagnoses of so-called alternative medicine (SCAM):
- adrenal fatigue,
- candidiasis hypersensitivity,
- chronic intoxications,
- chronic Lyme disease,
- electromagnetic hypersensitivity,
- homosexuality,
- leaky gut syndrome,
- multiple chemical sensitivity,
- neurasthenia.
Today I will briefly discuss three further fake diagnoses and list the treatments that SCAM practitioners might recommend for them.
Vaccine overload
Vaccine overload is a term for the notion that giving many vaccines at once may overwhelm or weaken a patient’s immune system which, in turn, is alleged to lead to adverse effects. Because children have an immature immune system, they are claimed to be afflicted most frequently.
There is no evidence that vaccine overload exists nor that it can lead to illness. This does not stop SCAM practitioners to apply or recommend all sorts of SCAMs for the imagined condition. Particular favourites are all sorts of detox diets, homeopathy and a wide range of dietary supplements. Such diets and supplements can be tricky for younger children. In this case, SCAM practitioners recommend, amongst many other things, smoothies or adding turmeric, ginger, and small amounts of Shillington’s adult supplements to the child’s food.
None of these recommendations are supported by anything resembling sound evidence, of course.
Vertebral subluxation
On this blog, we have discussed vertebral subluxations more often than I care to remember. Chiropractors claim that these figments of their imagination impair the flow of innate which, in turn, makes us ill. Straight chiros, those who adhere to the gospel of their guru DD Palmer, diagnose subluxations in 100% of their patients. They are undeterred by the fact that vertebral subluxations do not exist.
I can understand why! If they did aknowledge that the diagnosis is fake, they would have no reason to treat patients with spinal manipulations, and they would quickly go out of business.
Yin/Yang imbalance
According to the assumptions of practitioners of Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM), all health problems arise from an imbalaance of the two life forces , yin and yang. To restore the balance, they employ a range of therapies such as acupuncture, herbal mixtures, massages, etc.
But these life forces do not exist. Thus they cannot be out of balance, and consequently the imbalance cannot cause illness. TCM practitioners don’t want to hear any of this. Why not? You guessed it: if they aknowledged these facts, they would need to stop practising.
____________________
Fake diagnoses are the life-line of many SCAM practitioners:
- they tell you that something is wrong with you (despite the fact that you are entirely healthy);
- they make sure that this is a reason for serious concern;
- they claim they can put the alleged abnormality right again;
- they administer a lengthy series of treatments and/or sell you plenty of remedies;
- when they have earned enough money treating you, they give you the good news: you are back to narmal;
- gullible consumers are impressed by the unfailing competence of the SCAM practitioners.
My conclusion:
there is nothing easier and more profitably to heal that a condition that did not exist in the first place.
Edzard Ernst wrote:
“My conclusion:
there is nothing easier and more profitably to heal that a condition that did not exist in the first place.”
This sounds correct. But it isn’t
If the patients really are okay, and they do feel well, and there is no disease, then Edzard Ernst is right.
But when there IS something wrong, when the patients do feel ill, when there IS a disease or something plaguing the patients, then we have the devilish situation, that the patient does suffer, but the SCAM healer performs a theater, which does not help, but rips off the patient. A situation absolutely common for, e.g., homeopaths.
In the case of the homeopaths the situation is simple and the diagnosis is perfect: “Detuning the life force” (“Verstimmung der Lebenskraft”).
Homeopathy is about the most known fake treatment for a fake diagnosis.
Since such fake diagnoses plus fake treatments do not better the situation of the patient, the fraud can continue for the rest of the lifetime of the patient until his end – or of the money, whatever comes first.
I’m surprised that after so many years of debunking Chinese medicine, you haven’t grasped any of the basic concepts. Yin and Yang are phenomenological concepts, and cannot be measured with scientific instruments. These concepts are based on the observation of nature and the way it works, and they have developed into a set of principles that guide treatment strategy. They are no more or less ‘real’ than love or consciousness. I understand that they don’t sit happily in a scientific framework, but they are extremely valuable nonetheless.
“Yin and Yang are phenomenological concepts, and cannot be measured with scientific instruments.”
DID I CLAIM OTHERWISE?
I think you are surprising.
That is consistent with Tom’s statement: Yin and Yang are phenomenological concepts, and cannot be measured with scientific instruments.
The predictions made by phenomenological concepts can, of course, be tested scientifically.
Furthermore, the explanatory power and the explanatory depth of phenomenological concepts can be examined.
Rozenblit L, Keil F.
The misunderstood limits of folk science: an illusion of explanatory depth.
Cognitive Science. 2002 Sep 1;26(5):521-562.
doi:10.1207/s15516709cog2605_1
PMCID: PMC3062901.
See also:
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phenomenology
I honestly think that if the concepts of Yin and Yang were embraced by Western medicine, they could be used to great effect, for example in predicting which medicines individuals are likely to respond well/badly to. This is central to Chinese herbal medicine – each formula is designed to match the individual in their current state. The language (yin/yang, damp, cold, heat etc.) need not be the same, but a similar system which acknowledges the signs and symptoms of a patient’s internal environment, as well as just the disease label, could be revolutionary.
your idea is testable!
has it been tested?
if not, why not?
Lack of funding?
Applications for research funding are open even to acupuncturists!
Tom wrote: “but a similar system which acknowledges the signs and symptoms of a patient’s internal environment, as well as just the disease label, could be revolutionary”.
Such as a system that includes:
• cardiology
• clinical neurophysiology
• endocrinology
• gastroenterology
• gynaecology
• haematology
• immunology
• medical genetics
• nephrology
• neurology
• neuropathology
• oncology
• ophthalmology
• otorhinolaryngology (aka ENT)
• psychiatry
• pulmonology
• radiology
• rheumatology
• toxicology
• transfusiology
Western medicine is incredible, I’m a big fan in many ways! But none of these specialist areas takes account of the big picture of the patient in the way Chinese medicine can. Drugs are very often prescribed based on the major presenting symptom or condition alone, without taking into account the individual. Many patients feel this way too, at least in my experience.
your description of ‘Western medicine’ – an entity that actually does not even exist but is called evidence-based medicine – suggests that you do not understand it.
Tom wrote: “But none of these specialist areas takes account of the big picture of the patient…”.
I find it difficult to believe that someone who lives and works in England can be so astonishingly ignorant of current evidence-based medicine.
“It is difficult to get a man to understand something, when his salary depends upon his not understanding it.”
— Upton Beall Sinclair Jr.
‘Applications for research funding are open even to acupuncturists!’
Maybe one day 🙂
no, today – for instance, the MRC has no restrictions as to the profession of the applicant.
‘your description of ‘Western medicine’ – an entity that actually does not even exist but is called evidence-based medicine – suggests that you do not understand it.’
I think everyone knows what is meant by Western Medicine.
‘no, today – for instance, the MRC has no restrictions as to the profession of the applicant.’
I meant that maybe one day I will find the time to get the right people together and apply for funding. But it would of course also need the cooperation of people who could prescribe the medications.
Tom wrote: “I think everyone knows what is meant by Western Medicine”.
I don’t use the term Western medicine in a ‘snarly’ way. I’m not sure I agree with that post that’s it’s mainly used in that way. I would agree more with this definition:
‘A system in which medical doctors and other health care professionals (such as nurses, pharmacists, and therapists) treat symptoms and diseases using drugs, radiation, or surgery. Also called allopathic medicine, biomedicine, conventional medicine, mainstream medicine, and orthodox medicine.’
https://www.cancer.gov/publications/dictionaries/cancer-terms/def/western-medicine#
Tom wrote: “I don’t use the term Western medicine in a ‘snarly’ way”.
Nobody said that YOU use the term in a snarly way.