MD, PhD, MAE, FMedSci, FRCP, FRCPEd.

This study summarizes and discusses the characteristics and essence of meridians and acupoints from the perspectives of physics, chemistry and biology. An extensive body of literature from PubMed and the China National Knowledge Infrastructure was reviewed and categorized into three distinct groups: physical characteristics-related research (75 articles), which examined electrical, thermal, optical, acoustic and magnetic properties, and isotope migration; chemical characteristics-related literature (44 articles), focusing on chemical ions, oxygen partial pressure, nitric oxide and substance P; and biological essence-related research (52 articles), which primarily explored microcirculation, extracellular fluid channels, mast cells, telocytes, connexins, hilum of muscle and bone, and sensory nerve fibers. Current research emphasizes the electrical and thermal properties of the meridians and acupoints, whereas investigations into the essence of meridians are increasingly shifting from macroscopic to microscopic structures.

The authors concluded that it is essential to fully harness the advantages of interdisciplinary integration, which could significantly advance our understanding and applications in the realm of acupuncture and traditional medicine.

Why?

Why should it be “essential” to do that?

I would have thought it might be important [not essential] to review this subject as one reviews any subject in science. This would mean that one needs to discuss critically the evidence and plausibility of the concepts.

Sadly, the authors of this paper did the exact opposite. They cherry-picked the fairly extensive literature that aims to prove the existance of TCM assumptions like acupoints, meridians, etc. , while the less extensive literature that questions these assumptions is swept under the carpet.

And why do they do that?

Here is a hint:

“This article was supported by Chinese Association of Chinese Medicine Youth Talent Support Project Program (No. CACM-[2022-QNRC2-A09]), Tianjin Education Commission Research Program Project (No.2023KJ162), and National Natural Science Foundation of China Youth Program (No. 82105021).”
So, did the authors at least declare their conflict of interest/bias?
See for yourself:
“The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.”
I think that it is high time that everyone involved in so-called alternative medicine (SCAM) finally comprehends that:
  1. In SCAM, non-financial conflicts of interest are MUCH more poweful that financial ones.
  2. If we allow biased researchers to select the evidence they like, the ‘Flat Earth Society’ can easily demonstrate that our planet has the shape of a disc.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Subscribe via email

Enter your email address to receive notifications of new blog posts by email.

Recent Comments

Note that comments can be edited for up to five minutes after they are first submitted but you must tick the box: “Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.”

The most recent comments from all posts can be seen here.

Archives
Categories