MD, PhD, MAE, FMedSci, FRCP, FRCPEd.

Nearly every time that I talk to proponents of so-called alternative medicine (SCAM) I hear a lot about diet. Diet is a central theme to almost all of them, it seems. In such conversations, several issues often emerge and frequently take the form of accusations, e.g.:

  • Conventional medicine neglects the importance of diet for our health.
  • Medical students learn next to nothing about the subject.
  • In conventional medicine, hardly any research is focussed on diet.
  • By contrast, practitioners of SCAM know a lot about diet.
  • Many are experts in the subject.
  • Patients are well-advised to consult SCAM practitioners if they want to learn how to eat healthily.
  • SCAM practitioners have developed a wide range of diets that keep their patients fit and healthy.

I usually try to object to some of these points. The truth is that medical students do learn about diet, that doctors are aware of its importance, and that research into diets is highly active.

Particularly about the last point, I can get rather irritated. Sadly, this impresses the SCAM fans very little. They have their opinion and rarely budge.

After one such conversation, I decided to go on Medline and produce some figures. Here they are:

  • As of 6 October, there are 1 453 clinical trials listed on Medline as published in 2024.*
  • Between 1957 and today, around 57 000 such trials have been published.
  • Their number shows an almost exponential growth during this period.
  • The diets tested range widely and include, for instance, the Mediteranean diet, the ketogenic diet, intermittent fasting, vegetarian diet, energy restricted diet, gluten-free diet.
  • There are as good as no trials on any of the SCAM diets.
  • The researchers doing the diet trials are almost exclusively conventional medics or nutritionist.
  • I did not find any SCAM practitioners in the list of authors.

So, the next time a SCAM proponent bullshits you about diet, you can tell him or her to get lost!

 

 

*Not all are, in fact, clinical trials

 

21 Responses to The importance of diet in so-called alternative medicine

  • With enough reduction, you can prove anything and that is the problem with trials e.g. the huge nurses trial “proved” that a low protein diet made no difference to breast cancer.

    The problem was that the Western version of low-protein is still too high, according to The China Study that had less cancer in the poorer, rural populations than the richer, high protein diets of the urban populations. But that also depends on nigh-infinite other things such as the rich-Chinese smoked (in the 1980s) and don’t do hard physical labour etc.

    But then again, the rural peasants suffered more than the rich from the diseases of malnutrition and deficiency, so it seems that there might be a perfect balance? But even that might be wrong because evolution might have conditioned us for fasting during winter for an autophagy “clearout” that we no longer do.

    There is a reason why all SCAM focuses on diet: It’s a huge subject that entails the opposite of reduction: All of life is involved: Rare elements such as phosphorus slowly collect as a minute-film on the surface of the Earth in the soil from constant death-life cycle and more and more life is sustained with more and more P accumulating along with the correct proportions of everything else, S, N, Mg etc. Evidently the soil is just an extension of life and the more we destroy it, the more we destroy ourselves and all other life.

    • The China Study has been thoroughly criticised for decades. Try to keep up.

      Diet is notoriously difficult to study due to inability or funding to keep people literally locked up for long enough to get meaningful results. Most “studies” are observational or use animal models and therefore are not entirely meaningful for humans.

      Many different cultures have healthy diets even though they are very different in many ways. It just isn’t that difficult, nor does it require any one magical food group or product.

      Eat good (minimally processed) food, not too much, mostly plants. (Thank you to Michael Pollan)
      Add lots of spices would be my two cents.

    • What’s your view on the high protein “carnivore” diet as advocated by your fellow commentator “John”?
      Apparently “the results are very good”

    • Old Bob wrote: “Rare elements such as phosphorus…”

      Really?

      Phosphorus: symbol P; atomic number 15; abundance 0.105% — by no means a rare element.

      See Graphs of abundance vs atomic number, Wikipedia.

      For comparison, rhodium — major use (consuming about 80% of world rhodium production) is as one of the catalysts in the three-way catalytic converters in automobiles — has an abundance of 0.000 000 1%.

  • At present, there is a large amount of MD’s (among countless others) eating and endorsing a carnivore diet. Yes, they have done the blood work, and the results are very good.
    Will you live longer on the lion diet ? That has not been proven yet. However, it is apparent that they will in most cases experience a better quality of life, as evidenced by better health.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Subscribe via email

Enter your email address to receive notifications of new blog posts by email.

Recent Comments

Note that comments can be edited for up to five minutes after they are first submitted but you must tick the box: “Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.”

The most recent comments from all posts can be seen here.

Archives
Categories