MD, PhD, FMedSci, FRSB, FRCP, FRCPEd.

Actually, the article is not entitled ‘Explaining Homeopathy with Quantum Bollocks’, it has the title ‘Explaining Homeopathy with Quantum Electrodynamics’. Its two Italian authors have prestigious affiliations in the world of quantum physics:

  • Independent Researcher
  • Homeopathic Clinic, Bassano del Grappa

What they write must therefore be authorative and important. Let’s have a look; here is the abstract:

Every living organism is an open system operating far from thermodynamic equilibrium and exchanging energy, matter and information with an external environment. These exchanges are performed through non-linear interactions of billions of different biological components, at different levels, from the quantum to the macro-dimensional. The concept of quantum coherence is an inherent property of living cells, used for long-range interactions such as synchronization of cell division processes. There is support from recent advances in quantum biology, which demonstrate that coherence, as a state of order of matter coupled with electromagnetic (EM) fields, is one of the key quantum phenomena supporting life dynamics. Coherent phenomena are well explained by quantum field theory (QFT), a well-established theoretical framework in quantum physics. Water is essential for life, being the medium used by living organisms to carry out various biochemical reactions and playing a fundamental role in coherent phenomena.

Quantum electrodynamics (QED), which is the relativistic QFT of electrodynamics, deals with the interactions between EM fields and matter. QED provides theoretical models and experimental frameworks for the emergence and dynamics of coherent structures, even in living organisms. This article provides a model of multi-level coherence for living organisms in which fractal phase oscillations of water are able to link and regulate a biochemical reaction. A mathematical approach, based on the eigenfunctions of Laplace operator in hyper-structures, is explored as a valuable framework to simulate and explain the oneness dynamics of multi-level coherence in life. The preparation process of a homeopathic medicine is analyzed according to QED principles, thus providing a scientific explanation for the theoretical model of “information transfer” from the substance to the water solution. A subsequent step explores the action of a homeopathic medicine in a living organism according to QED principles and the phase-space attractor’s dynamics.

According to the developed model, all levels of a living organism organelles, cells, tissues, organs, organ systems, whole organism-are characterized by their own specific wave functions, whose phases are perfectly orchestrated in a multi-level coherence oneness. When this multi-level coherence is broken, a disease emerges. An example shows how a homeopathic medicine can bring back a patient from a disease state to a healthy one. In particular, by adopting QED, it is argued that in the preparation of homeopathic medicines, the progressive dilution/succussion processes create the conditions for the emergence of coherence domains (CDs) in the aqueous solution. Those domains code the original substance information (in terms of phase oscillations) and therefore they can transfer said information (by phase resonance) to the multi-level coherent structures of the living organism.

We encourage that QED principles and explanations become embodied in the fundamental teachings of the homeopathic method, thus providing the homeopath with a firm grounding in the practice of rational medicine. Systematic efforts in this direction should include multiple disciplines, such as quantum physics, quantum biology, conventional and homeopathic medicine and psychology.

I hope you agree that this is remarkable, perhaps even unique. The only similar paper I can remember is the one by my good friend Lionel Milgrom which concluded that quantum field theory demonstrates that quantum properties can be physical without being observable. Thus, an underlying similarity in discourse could exist between homeopathy and quantum theory which could be useful for modelling the homeopathic process. This preliminary investigation also suggested that key elements of previous quantum models of the homeopathic process, may become unified within this new QFT-type approach.

As far as I can see, the two authors of the new paper (published in the journal ‘Homeopathy‘) have just revolutionised our understanding of:

  • quantum physics,
  • human physiology,
  • pathophysiology,
  • therapeutics,
  • homeopathy.

Not a mean feast, you must admit.

Alternatively – and I am genuinely uncertain here – the journal ‘Homeopathy’ has just fallen victim of a hilarious spoof.

Please, do tell me which is the case.

16 Responses to Explaining Homeopathy with Quantum Bollocks

  • Ah yes. Quantum Theory: The branch of science with which people who know exactly sod all about Quantum Theory can explain anything and everything.

  • This is clearly a hoax or spoof – along the lines of many others, e.g. Professor John C McLachlan’s Integrative Medicine and the Point of Credulity, BMJ 2010.

    In this, McLachlan claimed he had discovered a homunculus represented on human buttocks and capable of beneficial stimulation by acupuncture at the appropriate ‘point’. The publishers of the BMJ knew it was a false report and spoof, but wanted to expose how credulous some folks are – McLachlan had been invited to talk on his paper at an international conference on ‘integrated medicine’.

    Note the homeopathy article is published just before the first of April!

  • As Professor Jim Al-Khalili has said: “Let me make this very clear: if you think QM allows for homeopathy, psychic phenomena, ESP etc then you’d better take a proper course in QM”.

  • “Independent Researcher”

    Ah, yes. An ‘independent researcher’ is of course far more trustworthy than well-educated experts in the field. After all, said experts are (gasp!) PAID for engaging their knowledge and expertise – and we all know that as soon as people are paid to do something, they will abandon all independence and honesty, and lie and defraud and mislead the rest of the world in order to please the source of their finance. We see this all the time in “vaccine research”.

    You simply can’t trust any paid expert! So it’s far better to rely on unpaid “independent researchers” with a totally independent background – Google Academy usually, and, of course, their own reasoning skills (read: fantasy).

    [/sarcasm]

  • The modern rebirth of vitalism, only differently wrongly explained than in Hahnemann’s time.

    This raises a big problem now:
    In which category should the authors receive a Nobel Prize?

    • In which category should the authors receive a Nobel Prize?

      Literature. As I have been told this very weekend, nothing can be literature unless it is fiction. It seems appropiate too, since fiction does not usually qualify as science ^_^

  • Are we sure that one of the authors is not Alan Sokel under an alias? Or maybe he is both authors?

  • I read the abstract.
    Come to think of it strike the word “read” and replace it with “suffered”.

    Like airflow over a stalling wing, the authors separate from reality with the very first sentence: “Every living organism is an open system operating far from thermodynamic equilibrium”.
    The rest could just as well have been written by a computer program controlled by a random nonsense generator, like this one for example.

    • I followed your link, and I am quite impressed. That site shows how much progress has been made towards the Turing test.

  • I sent on to you people a triple blnded study supporting homeopathy with a link to many more (and not a word out of you), and instead, I note, you dug up some “research” done by fascist nazi thugs almost 100 years ago and felt it merited your attention more…. more impressionistic your motive seems than scientific.

    https://drnancymalik.wordpress.com/article/scientific-research-in-homeopathy/

    “Scientific Research in Homeopathy: Advances and Challenges

    Triple Blind Randomised Placebo-Controlled Trial, Systematic Reviews and Meta Analysis, Evidence-base, Body of Evidence”

  • This is what quantum physics looks like when it has been rewritten observing on the laws of grammar, instead of the laws of physics.

  • huh?

  • I suggest to readers who do not yet know the excellent book by Alan Sokal and Jean Bricmont: Fashionable Nonsense (1995). In Portuguese:Intellectuals Impostures.

  • I have to say the paper brings to mind the Orch OR thesis of Penrose and Hameroff which is literally mind-boggling positing, as it does, that orchestrated reduction of quantum coherence in microtubules within neurons explains human consciousness. Deepak Chopra is a big fan.

    In the purported homeopathy explanation, decoherence of the “oneness” wave function leads to disease. Orch OR in microtubules relates to space-time geometry, whereas the homeopathy paper relates to electrodynamics.

    I see further speculative potential along these lines pertaining to the strong nuclear force.

  • My understanding is that quantum coherence works only while particles have their states constrained, which requires (among other things) that they interact with very few other particles, so it is impossible for something as big and complex as a cell at room temperature to ever be in a state of quantum coherence. Actually demonstrating quantum coherence across a single cell during cell division would be 1) impossible and 2) Nobel prize winning.
    Just one spot where this seems obvious quantum bollocks or “You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means.” — Inigo Montoya, The Princess Bride,

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

If you want to be able to edit your comment for five minutes after you first submit it, you will need to tick the box: “Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.”
Recent Comments

Note that comments can be edited for up to five minutes after they are first submitted but you must tick the box: “Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.”

The most recent comments from all posts can be seen here.

Categories