Search Results for: A+B versus B
... be crucial to know how many of the trials followed an A+B versus B design (I suspect most studies did, and this would completely ...
... attempt to control for placebo effects. Many followed the A+B versus B design which invariably produces (false-) positive results. Only 4 out ...
... already guessed it: the trail follows the infamous ‘A+B versus B’ design. Some people will think that I am obsessed with this ...
... but – because it followed the often-discussed ‘A+B versus B’ design – this study does simply not show what the authors ...
... small to allow firm conclusions and it follows the ‘A+B versus B’ design. Therefore, we need to ask whether the findings are ...
... The most popular one in SCAM research is the ‘A+B versus B’ design. In this study, for instance, cancer patients who were ...
... SCAM, alone or associated with other forms of pain relief, versus other treatments or placebo or no treatment, for the treatment of ... trial designs that cannot control for placebo effects (e.g A+B versus B); therefore they tell us nothing about the effectiveness of the ...
... Process (LP) is a commercial programme developed by Phil Parker based on ideas from osteopathy, life ... with CFS/ME. The trial was designed as an ‘A+B versus B’ study which practically always generates a positive outcome. It ...
... on the outcome. As this trial followed the infamous ‘A+B versus B’ design, one would have expected that the two add on treatments ...
... adverse events. How odd! This trial followed the infamous A+B versus B design. As [A+B] is more than [B] alone, one would have expected that ...
